What’s Good For The Goose Is Good For The Gander?

Some deranged women (maybe; who knows for sure these days) are trying to declare a sex strike. Specifically, no sex with any man who won’t get a vasectomy.

Somehow I doubt these are women I’d want to have sex with anyway.

Pro-abortion activists threaten abstinence in response to SCOTUS overturning Roe
“If you’re a man who won’t get a vasectomy, even though it’s reversible, and you’re not out in the streets fighting for my rights, you do not deserve to have sex with me,” said Brianna Campbell, a 24-year-old EMT.

So these women apparently are won’t use other forms of birth control — condoms, the pill, IUD, etc — but demand that men take all the responsibility by undergoing a surgical procedure.

So why don’t these unfuckable harpies get tubal ligations themselves? It’s about as reversible as a vasectomy.

“My body, my choice, your responsibility.”

Frankly, I’m glad these congenital idiots don’t want to breed. Elective eugenics works for me.

 

If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in my tip jar. I could really use the money, what with ISP bills, site hosting and SSL certificate, new 2021 model hip, and general life expenses.Click here to donate via PayPal.
(More Tip Jar Options)

But Did You Notice?

Colorado man gets drunk, steals a police vehicle, and responds to 911 calls
A Lake George, Colorado, man stole an unstaffed Sheriff’s vehicle at the Park County Sherriff’s office.

Then at around 3:30 a.m. he showed up at a domestic violence call in neighboring Teller County.

Read it, and see if you can spot the important point.

Just then the actual police showed up, and the man sped off in his stolen patrol car.

Drunk, crazy guy’s response time was better than the real cops.

Hat tip to Zendo Deb.

 

If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in my tip jar. I could really use the money, what with ISP bills, site hosting and SSL certificate, new 2021 model hip, and general life expenses.Click here to donate via PayPal.
(More Tip Jar Options)

“Uh… Just Kidding, Guys”

As usual, a lefty moron failed to consider consequences.

“F*ck America!” – Washed Up Green Day Singer Says He’s Renouncing His US Citizenship Because of Supreme Court Decision on Roe v Wade
“F*ck America. I’m f*cking renouncing my citizenship. I’m f*cking coming here,’ Armstrong shouted to a London crowd Friday night.

“There’s just too much f*cking stupid in the world to go back to that miserable f*cking excuse for a country!” the 50-year-old shouted.

Armstrong continued, “Oh, I’m not kidding, you’re going to get a lot of me in the coming days.”

It’s a good thing — for him — that he’s not coming back here. He’d run into just a little trouble at Customs. And I wonder if he filed his IRS form 8854 yet. He might find that part somewhat expensive.

Damned fool. America has problems. But I’m not bailing out; I’d rather fix what I can. Of course, this idiot just fixed one small problem for me.

He won’t be missed ’round here.

 

If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in my tip jar. I could really use the money, what with ISP bills, site hosting and SSL certificate, new 2021 model hip, and general life expenses.Click here to donate via PayPal.
(More Tip Jar Options)

“Law-Abiding”

Observant readers should have noticed that law-abiding is always in parentheses in my earlier post. That’s because I don’t really like the term, and only use it to make a point about the term.

“Law-abiding” doesn’t mean “honest and peaceable.”

“Law-abiding” means you are compliant with every law; whether it’s sensible or irrational, or even it it’s destructive. Even if you were unaware of the law.

Law-abiding,” for instance, means you never dug a hole or tilled a garden without informing the relevant notification authority and waiting for strangers to come onto your property and paint the ground. If you have, you aren’t “law-abiding;” you may be an unconvicted felon. Law-abiding” means you never popped the flow restricter out of a shower head, or installed a toilet that hold “too much” water. “Law-abiding” means you never coasted through a stop sign because there was no other traffic.

“Law-abiding” means you’ll never be anonymously accused other potentially committing a crime in the future.

 

If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in my tip jar. I could really use the money, what with ISP bills, site hosting and SSL certificate, new 2021 model hip, and general life expenses.Click here to donate via PayPal.
(More Tip Jar Options)

246 Years Of Slippery Slope Make A Great Power Source

The Dims, with their compliant Repugnant cronies, have developed a new source of green, renewable energy.

Slip a generator drive belt around spinning-in-his-grave James Madison.

For one-hundred ninety-two years, there was no general precedent for disarming a class of people, other than some discriminatory and racist laws banning the arming of Blacks and Indians, and the occasional religious group; I hope no one wants to bring that back. But I’m not too sure.

Continue reading 246 Years Of Slippery Slope Make A Great Power Source

Defenseless?

David thinks this is a troll having fun provoking insane lefties into… unwise behavior.

I’m inclined to think he’s serious, if somewhat ill-informed.

Defenseless? That’s not what those prowlers thought when the entire — well-armed — neighborhood mobilized to encourage them to depart.

We’re well-armed, and we have coyotes, gators, and pigs to handle the leftovers.

 

If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in my tip jar. I could really use the money, what with ISP bills, site hosting and SSL certificate, new 2021 model hip, and general life expenses.Click here to donate via PayPal.
(More Tip Jar Options)

Busy Day At The Zelman Partisans

I have two new columns up over there.


NEVER BEFORE?
Suck it up, buttercup. But this…

He said that “the court has done what they have never done before, expressly take away a constitutional right that is so fundamental, so many Americans have already been recognized.”

Never before? I beg to differ. Gun owners have become accustomed to being stripped of a constitutional right by the Supreme Court since 1939. A right that, unlike abortion, is actually specifically listed in the Constitution.
[Read more]



RETURN OF THE VICHY NRA?
The NRA “compromised” to saddle us with the National Firearms Act (taxing and registering wide classes of firearms).

The NRA “compromised” to saddle us with the Gun Control Act prohibited persons, loss of mail order, and more).
[…]
It appears we can add another “compromise” to the list.

[Read more]


 

If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in my tip jar. I could really use the money, what with ISP bills, site hosting and SSL certificate, new 2021 model hip, and general life expenses.Click here to donate via PayPal.
(More Tip Jar Options)

If I Were Sen. Rubio, I’d Be Pissed About This

I had been watching congress.gov for the Gang-Rape Safer Communities Act, the “bipartisan” Senate gun control bill. I had the text, but I wanted the bill number. But it appeared that they’d fast-tracked it so much that congress.gov couldn’t keep.

But then I got an email from FPC that mentioned the bill number: S.2938, and all became clear

Why look at that. The permanent gov record of this rights-raping monstrosity shows that it was sponsored by Republican Marco Rubio. It was introduced October 2021.

Say what?

That’s how they got the gun control bill to the floor so fast. They took a Rubio bill that had already passed the Senate and House. Then the oath-violating “bipartisan” victim-disarmers amended Rubio’s bill (which was originally just naming a court house), tacking on the BS anti-2A language.

It’s hardly the first time I’ve seen that. More often though, it’s someone rushing an “empty” placeholder bill into the bill queue — generally near the beginning of a session — with the plan to amend the real text in later. It’s a way to get ahead in line when your bill isn’t quite ready.

Other times, they’ll ask someone with a minor action bill if they can sacrifice his for the next text.

Somehow I doubt that they asked Rubio if he minded showing up in the record as the sponsor of this.

 

If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in my tip jar. I could really use the money, what with ISP bills, site hosting and SSL certificate, new 2021 model hip, and general life expenses.Click here to donate via PayPal.
(More Tip Jar Options)

This Should Be An Interesting Weekend

With the Left already freaking out over yesterday’s NYSRPA v. Bruen ruling in favor of the Second Amendment, we now have Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health.

We end this opinion where we began. Abortion presents a profound moral question. The Constitution does not prohibit the citizens of each State from regulating or prohibiting abortion. Roe and Casey arrogated that authority. We now overrule those decisions and return that authority to the people and their elected representatives. The judgment of the Fifth Circuit is reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

I agree with the end ruling, but I’ve not waded through the 213 pages of reasoning. But Alito wrote the majority opinion; from past experience, I’ll likely find his reasoning to be sound.

With these two decisions, I’m not going to surprised if someone tries more serious and professional assassination attempt on conservative Justices, just so the Dementia Administration can nominate a couple more leftist nutjobs to the bench.

On the other hand, since the administration is officially declaring they’ll just ignore Supreme Court rulings, maybe no one will bother.

Riots tonight should entertaining for those of us outside of the radius of total destruction.

 

If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in my tip jar. I could really use the money, what with ISP bills, site hosting and SSL certificate, new 2021 model hip, and general life expenses.Click here to donate via PayPal.
(More Tip Jar Options)

The Court Of Last Resort

NYSRPA v. Bruen has the left freaking out. Watching lefty talking heads is amusing, and yet a bit disturbing at the same time. So what; they’re just talking heads.

But have both the Department of Justice and the President of the United States ever before issued official statements declaring the Supreme Court to be wrong, and stating outright that they will assist states in continuing their infringements of human/civil rights?

In a case in which the federal government was not even a party?

If the the Supreme Court is no longer our court of last resort, if the rule of law no longer applies, what resort do the people have left?

I’m really seeing just one, and I don’t think filing “appeals” by caliber would be fun for anyone.

That does seem to be the path the Left wants to walk, though.

 

If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in my tip jar. I could really use the money, what with ISP bills, site hosting and SSL certificate, new 2021 model hip, and general life expenses.Click here to donate via PayPal.
(More Tip Jar Options)