Pseudo-Vax AIDS and ADE

A friend sent me this link this morning.

“You were way ahead of the curve on ADE”

Here ’tis:

UK Government refuses to publish further COVID-19 Data because it suggests the Triple Vaccinated are developing AIDS & the Double Vaccinated are suffering ADE
The UK Health Security Agency is refusing to publish any further data on Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations and deaths by vaccination status because previous figures show that the triple vaccinated population are on the verge of developing Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, and the double vaccinated are suffering Antibody-Dependent Enhancement.

Yep. I was 14 months ahead.

US Government Admits ChinCOVID Pseudo-Vaccines Are Killing People

This quote, from HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra, is so horrific that I had to watch the video to see if it was… selectively quoted, or taken out of context.*

“By the way, we know that vaccines are killing people of color — blacks, Latinos, indigenous people — at about two times the rate of white Americans,” Becerra explained during a digital “White House Convening on Equity” seminar on April 14.

But the government needs to “work” harder to vaccinate Americans who have refrained from getting inoculated, he argued.

That’s an accurate quote.

We know it’s killing people, so we we need to get more people jabbed.

We know it’s even more likely to kill people of color, so we need to get them jabbed especially.

Anyone remember the ’76 swine flu vax? They stopped that before anyone died, on the basis of a high incidence of Guillain-Barré syndrome. (There were 3 deaths in October, but they were later determined not to be vax-caused.)

Welcome to the 21st century: We know it may kill you, but get jabbed against a disease that probably won’t.

Time for trials: mass murder and crimes against humanity.


* That’s why I like The Gateway Pundit. They have a definite bias, but they are good about providing sources so you can more easily fact-check them.

And just in time for the mid-terms, everyone stopped dying “of” ChinCOVID.

HHS dropped the requirement (see pages 4, 12) for hospitals to report “COVID-19 deaths.”

Actually, they dropped the reporting requirements for several things; ED overflow, ICU overflow, PPE, etc. Apparently ChinCOVID just went away and stopped being politically useful panic-inducing pandemic.

Who woulda thought it?

Tell me more about how effective the ChinCOVID pseudovax is.

‘Cuz the math doesn’t seem to add up, Hotez.


Dr. Hotez: ‘150,000 Unvaccinated Americans Needlessly Lost Their Lives Because They Were Defiant’
Center for Vaccine Development director Dr. Peter Hotez said Monday on MSNBC’s “Andrea Mitchell Reports” that since COVID-19 vaccines have been available, “150,000 unvaccinated Americans needlessly lost their lives because they were defiant.”


Lessee, the first pseudo-vax became available in December 2020. At that time some 370,000 deaths were attributed to COVID.

Since the pseudo-vax has been available, another 429,000+/- have died. But if only 150,000 were us unwashed, ignorant anti-pseudo-vaxxers, then that implies the other 279,000 dead were enlightened vaxxed.

So:

Un”vaxxed: 150K/429K = 34.9%
“Vaxxed: 279K/429K = 65%

Given those numbers, I think I’ll just go on being “defiant.”

 

If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in my tip jar. I could really use the money, what with ISP bills, site hosting and SSL certificate, new 2021 model hip, and general life expenses.Click here to donate via PayPal.

Aother ChinCOVID “Treatment” That The FDA Seems To Like

Merck’s molnupiravir.

Come near me with this… stuff and I’ll offer you an experimental gun violence vaccine. I mean, what could possibly go wrong with…


Merck’s drug uses a novel approach to fight COVID-19: it inserts tiny mutations into the coronavirus’ genetic code to the point that it can’t reproduce itself.


…a drug that’s meant to cause viruses to mutate. As if they don’t mutate constantly already. Well, there’s always…


But that genetic effect has raised concerns that in rare cases the drug could cause birth defects or tumors.


A drug that cause genetic mutations might cause genetic mutations? Say it ain’t so. But at least it’s effec…


Among more than 1,400 adults in a company study, molnupiravir reduced the combined risk of hospitalization and death by 30%, less than the 50% initially reported based on incomplete results.


A deliberate mutagen that has less than a 1 in 3 chance of doing me any good at all?

Dang. It’s almost as if they’re trying to drive me into the “COVID/COVID treatments are a genocidal plot” conspiracy theory camp.

Um, almost?


Regulators also noted that Merck collected far less safety data overall on its drug than was gathered for other COVID-19 therapies.


Probably because more complete safety data would have been even worse than what they’re admitting.

Doesn’t Look Good For CDC Pseudo-Vax Numbers

You may recall that some six months ago, barely over half of NIAID, FDA, and CDC employees would get the ChinCOVID pseudo-vax jabs (even though they’re just fine with us getting stuck). Months later, a a feddie employee pseudo-vax mandate, and the chance to set a “fine” example”…


As Biden Mandates Vaccines, CDC Director Walensky Stumbles When Asked How Many CDC Employees Are Vaccinated
“What percent of CDC employees are vaccinated?” Rep. Cassidy asked.

“We’re actively encouraging vaccination on all of our employees and doing a lot of education and outreach in order to get our agency fully vaccinated,’ she said, completely dodging the question.

“And the — but the percent?” he asked.

“I don’t have that for you today,” she admitted.


How odd. What with the mandate, and the hearing subject, you’d think she’d have the number sitting right there.

 

If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in my tip jar. I could really use the money, what with new cell phone, ISP bills, SSL certificate, and general life expenses.Click here to donate via PayPal.

OSHA’s Insane Pseudo-Vax Mandate Is Official

The rule/emergency temporary standard is HERE. I recommend commenting on it. My own comment, kvm-hl07-1qtk, reads as follows:


You are mandating that employees choose between employment and “vaccination.” I put “vaccination” in parentheses because the CDC currently has TWO differing definitions of “vaccine.”

The long standing definition is a substance that directly confers immunity.

For COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 ALONE, the goverment has adopted a second definition of a substance that MAY confer some protection against the worst symptoms, but prevents neither infection, transmission, nor illness.

The COVID-19 pseudo-vaccines seems pointless.

Additionally, the currently available COVID-19 “vaccines” has been associated with the highest rate of adverse effects (including DEATH) of any vaccine in recorded history.

The COVID-19 pseudo-vaccines seem dangerous.

Currently, and for the foreseeable future, no APPROVED adult form COVID-19 “vaccine” is available. The approved vaccine, Pfizer’s Comirnaty, has not shipped. Because of the legal differences between EUA and approved vaccines, a person who accepts an EUA jab instead waiting for the unavailable Comirnaty has little effective recourse is seeking compensation from the manufacturer, in the event of an adverse effect.

This places the employer at full liability for any adverse effects experienced in a association with an inoculation with an EUA medication WHICH IS ONLY AUTHORIZED ON A VOLUNTARY BASIS, with complete informed consent.

Your emergency temporary standard is insane, and will go far to completing the economic collapse of the nation.


Please note that my objections are not based on wild conspiracy sites, or “alternate” medicine claims. They ARE based on data provided by Pfizer, FDA, The CDC, and OSHA themselves.

Commenting on a rule already in effect may seem pointless, but it’s to put them on notice that we are know what they’ve done and continue to watch.

If I can comment in my current pained condition, so can you.

 

If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in my tip jar. I could really use the money, what with new cell phone, ISP bills, SSL certificate, and general life expenses.Click here to donate via PayPal.

“But we’re never going to learn about how safe this vaccine is unless you start giving it.”

That’s just the way it goes.

Funny, that’s what I thought Stage 1, 2, and 3 trials were for.

If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in my tip jar. I could really use the money, what with new cell phone, ISP bills, SSL certificate, and general life expenses.Click here to donate via PayPal.

Presented without comment,

…other than “Draw your own conclusions.”

Questions you need to answer before approving the COVID vaccines for any age group

If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in my tip jar. I could really use the money, what with new cell phone, ISP bills, SSL certificate, and general life expenses.Click here to donate via PayPal.

COVID Vax Causing AIDS?

I’m starting to see this UK report pop up.


A comparison of official Government reports suggest the Fully Vaccinated are developing Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
Latest UK PHE Vaccine Surveillance Report figures on Covid cases show that doubly vaccinated 40-70 year olds have lost 40% of their immune system capability compared to unvaccinated people. Their immune systems are deteriorating at around 5% per week (between 2.7% and 8.7%). If this continues then 30-50 year olds will have 100% immune system degradation, zero viral defence by Christmas and all doubly vaccinated people over 30 will have lost their immune systems by March next year.


Nope. That data does not show people getting Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome. The Expose has confused “vaccine efficacy” with immunosuppression. The data presented only shows that the pseudo-vax becomes less effective against SARS-CoV-2 over time. It does not show why that seems to be the case.

The effectivess can drop for other reasons, like SARS-CoV-2 variants not as well recognized by pseudo-vax-prompted antibodies.

The data we need to be able to say that the pseudo-vaxxes cause AIDS is comparisons of lymphocytes in the blood:

  • Before the jab
  • After the first jab
  • After the second jab
  • And periodically after that, to see if there is a continuing trend.

To date, I am aware of one case of this being done, by doctor who was concerned about a specific patient. He did see a significant drop in lymphocytes, which he specifically compared to AIDS. He called for more doctors to check this.

There is also a report that “Pfizer data shows significant lymphocyte depletion in the first week after vaccination.” I have not seen that data.

Perhaps the pseudo-vaxxes are causing AIDS, but The Expose story does not support their own claim.

If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in my tip jar. I could really use the money, what with new cell phone, ISP bills, SSL certificate, and general life expenses.Click here to donate via PayPal.