The National Institutes of Health are finally getting around to looking into the thousands of anecdotal reports of possible pseudo-vax effects on menstrual cycles.
NIH orders $1.67M study on how COVID-19 vaccine impacts menstrual cycle
“Our goal is to provide menstruating people with information, mainly as to what to expect, because I think that was the biggest issue: Nobody expected it to affect the menstrual system, because the information wasn’t being collected in the early vaccine studies,” said NICHD director Diana Bianchi in a statement to the Lily — reportedly crediting their early coverage for helping to make the NIH aware.
BS. Recall the list of potential adverse effects the FDA planned to watch for, prior to the pseudo-vax roll-out.
FDA Safety Surveillance of COVID-19 Vaccines: DRAFT Working list of possible adverse event outcomes ***Subject to change***
[…]
-Preganacy and birth outcomes
I don’t know if there’s anything to this or not. But someone should have been formally checking it out months ago.
| If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in my tip jar. I could really use the money, what with new cell phone, ISP bills, SSL certificate, and general life expenses.Click here to donate via PayPal. |
Yet another “adverse reaction” that animal testing during the years of standard vaccine research would probably reveal… if the animals were to survive that is. During previous mRNA vaccine research, 100% of the animal subjects DIED. The J&J jab has that nasty clotting problem which probably screws with menstrual cycles in a different way. Who the hell knows?
If you’ve agreed to be a big pharma lab rat and been jabbed, and are now concerned with these problems, it’s a little too late. Maybe you can live a little longer if you forgo any subsequent “boosters.”
Do you have a source for that “100%” claim? I’ve seen that number bandied about, but never sourced. Prior to SARS-CoV-2, no mRNA animal trial ever went well. I have a sneaking suspicion “100%” is based on one paper on the SARS vax, in which all the mice ended up dead. But that was because all the surviving mice were killed for dissection and detailed examination of tissues and organs. (And if you want to know what sort of averse reactions that testing turned up, look at list of potential reactions the FDA planned to watch out for.)
The Pfizer SARS-CoV-2 vax did have animal testing concurrent with human testing (Nuremberg Code violation). I found one paper on the results. But what struck me as odd is that only addressed efficacy, and never mentioned adverse reactions at all.