Court REJECTS FDA Request to Release Vaccine FOIA Documents Over the Next 55 Years – Orders Agency to Turn Over Tens of Thousands of Pfizer Docs Monthly
On Thursday, a Federal Judge “soundly” rejected the FDA’s panicked request for permission to produce hundreds of thousands of documents related to Pfizer and the Covid vaccines at a rate of 500 pages per month after the agency was ordered to comply with a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request last month.
The FDA’s unbelievable request would have allowed them to take an unbelievable 55 years to produce all of the documents.
This stonewalling made it clear that one of two things happened.
Either the FDA needed 55 years to completely review the Pfizer emergency authorization (and subsequent approval), raising the question of “How in hell they first reviewed it in a three months and issued an authorization;” or…
They knew from the beginning, pre-authorization, that the pseudo-vax had extremely serious problems, authorized it anyway for whatever — bribe-related; who knows? — reason, and are trying to hide the fact now until the potentially guilty are long gone and beyond punishment.
Consider authorization vs. approval:
Emergency use authorization is only allowed for unapproved experimental preparations/procedures when there is a desperate need for, and there is no approved treatment available. EUA protects the manufacturer from — essentially — any liability because it can only be used voluntarily by someone with informed consent who understands that it is experimental and it’s at their own risk. The Pfizer-BioNTech pseudo-vax is EUA.
Approval comes after the pseudo-vax has supposedly been found to be effective and safe. Approved vaccines still come with hefty liability protections for the manufacturer. But if the manufacturer did something wrong it can still be sued for adverse effects.
When the FDA approved Comirnaty, it did something unprecedented: It approved one version of the pseudo-vax, declared it medically the same as the EUA Pfizer-BioNTech, but continued the EUA even though EUAs are supposed to go away when something gets approved. Have your cake and eat it, too, Pfizer.
Except Pfizer isn’t shipping approved Comirnaty in the US. It’s still shipping the legally different — completely liability protected — EUA version. And neither Pfizer nor the FDA want anyone to see all the data on the pseudo-vaccines for 55 years.
I expect I’d be dead by then. Likely you will, too. Along with the Pfizer and FDA execs.
My guess is that the docs the FDA is fighting to withhold, until no one can be held accountable, will show Pfizer — and FDA — wrongdoing of exactly the sort that would allow lawsuits to proceed under standard vaccine law. The FOIA stall appears to be simple CYA.
And that’s why Pfizer is only shipping the EUA pseudo-vax, and the FDA “inexplicably” allowed it to continue. Under the EUA, Pfizer remains bullet-proof, lawsuit-wise.
I wonder if they think they’re bullet bullet-proof.
A few predictions:
The initial batch of 12,000 pages will be carefully chosen to be innocuous.
The next batches will be as innocuously chosen as the FDA can manage.
As page releases go on, the data will be increasingly less innocuous, but also increasingly redacted.
The most incriminating pages will be last released, and most redacted.
We’re facing years of additional court hearings over the continual redactions.
Pfizer — and FDA — execs might still pass away before full accountability. In court.
