And Putin could be telling the absolute truth, so far as he knows.

The emphasis in on “know.”


Putin Flatly Denies That He’s Behind Recent US Cyberattacks
Russian President Vladimir Putin denied that he was behind the recent cyberattacks across the United States, calling the allegations against him “farcical.”

“We have been accused of all kinds of things,” Putin told NBC News Monday. “Election interference, cyberattacks and so on and so forth. And not once, not once, not one time, did they bother to produce any kind of evidence or proof. Just unfounded accusations.”

Russian intelligence and Russian-speaking groups have launched wide-ranging cyberattacks in recent months, affecting American consumer goods ranging from gasoline to meat.


Unless US intel cares to share their proof that Putin personally ordered the alleged 2016 election hacks, I’m undecided on these recent ransomware attacks. I think it’s 50:50 whether it’s Russian intelligence or Russian mobs. Or a combination.

But say it is an actual Russian government op. Do you really think the head of state of any country knows absolutely everything some bureaucrat — especially bureaucrats already working in the dark — is up to? And there might not be much paperwork to track it down through.

Imagine someone wants funding for a black op. But they want to keep it black, and not even explain to… say, the SSCI by asking for the money. So you do an off-the-books operation to make money. Maybe you’ll secretly sell arms to one country, and use the profits to fund the black op you really. Iran Contra ring any bells?

Maybe you could create an entire shell company, like Air America.

So, yeah; there could be an op more-or-less run by the Russian government that even Putin wouldn’t have been told about. In fact, given stories I’ve heard about the interchangeability of gov and mob in Russia, I could be convinced to consider it likely. You’ve got this great hacking tool, and your upper level bosses don’t know it. It’s making millions for you. Not only is it funding the stuff you want to do, but…

There’s all that money just sitting there. Completely off the books, ready to skim. You cut your supervisor and co-workers in to keep them quiet. You buy a pleasant little dacha in the country.

Maybe the hacking started as an official op, but again,those great tools are just sitting there, begging to be used. So maybe you extort a couple more US companies on your own time. Boss and co-workers don’t even know, so you keep all. More dachas! But all strictly freelance; sorta like playing solitaire all day on company time.

Now, allowing for Putin’s intel background, he probably understands this. And so long as the fallout is useful, he won’t ask uncomfortable questions. But if it starts getting awkward, he’ll put out a quiet word. And maybe demand his own cut.

If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in my tip jar. I could really use the money, what with ISP bills, rabbit feed, and general life expenses.Click here to donate via PayPal.

Pennsylvania Elections: “Well Run”


Election Assessment in Pennsylvania County Uncovers Five ‘Issues of Note’
Wake TSI said in its report summary that it found that the election “was well run, was conducted in a diligent and effective manner and followed the directions of Pennsylvania.”


That’s good to know. “Well run,” except for the parts they list.

  • Dominion failed to meet the commonwealth’s certification standards
  • the election management system had Microsoft SQL Server Data Tools installed, despite the software not being part of the U.S. Election Assistance Commission’s certified configuration;
  • changes were made to the management system just three weeks prior to the election.
  • “allows any user with access to change and manipulate the EMS databases without logging [recording] to the Database, EMS, or [operating system] logfiles.”
  • Dominion failed to fill out a document that attests that the installed software versions conformed with certified reasons
  • the county not keeping documentation on whether logic and accuracy testing was done on the machines, which is inconsistent with the Pennsylvania Department of State’s conditions for certification
  • scanning errors identified in two sets of log files exceeded the allowable error rate set by the federal government.

But other than that, how did you enjoy the play, Mrs. Lincoln?

If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in my tip jar. I could really use the money, what with ISP bills, rabbit feed, and general life expenses.Click here to donate via PayPal.

Guns In Real Estate Listings?

Lib urininalists are funny. Virginia Heffernan has a plan. (Normally I’d include screencaps, but I’m having trouble uploading images today.)

Real-estate listings should include prevalence of gun-ownership in a 50-mile radius and number of annual mass shootings in the region.

Time to change what a “bad neighborhood” is.

Hun, New York is not America. How exactly does she propose to calculate that in the majority of the country, that doesn’t register firearms or the owners? Taking Georgia as an example… in fact, southeast Georgia.

Phone surveys? ‘Round here, if an anonymous stranger calls and asks how many guns you have, expect to be lied to.

Of course, as matter of local society, you could count the number of homes, multiply that by the number of people in each home, and get a low end approximation. Pro tip: if there’s a single family dwelling with a single resident, round that up two guns; front and back door guns are common.

Then there’s this.

…and introduce a meaningful tax on guns and gun violence.

No one should say “this is a great place to raise kids” about neighborhoods where even one person has an assault rifle.

I wonder what she’d consider “meaningful,” or if she’s even slightly aware that there’s already a federal tax on guns and ammunition. Several states add their own firearm-specific taxes, and then there’s the plain sales tax. Privacy isn’t the only reason I prefer private sales.

And taxing “gun violence”? How’s that work? Do we have revenuers patrolling bad neighborhoods and handing out tax bills to gangbangers? Or maybe gangs will have accounts where they make quarterly payments. How many people did your gang shoot JAN-MAR? Multiply line 7 by 10. Payment due is S X 10 = $NN.

Will mass shootings get a discount? Or a surcharge?

If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in my tip jar. I could really use the money, what with ISP bills, rabbit feed, and general life expenses.Click here to donate via PayPal.

ChinCOVID Can Cause Diabetes

Apparently doctors noticed people with ChinCOVID getting diabetes. I lost the link, but I think it was 14.4% of COVID-19 patients.

A couple of studies appear to have found the mechanism, and I find it a bit alarming. Here’s one of them, funded by the National Institues for Health.


SARS-CoV-2 infection induces beta cell transdifferentiation
Abstract
Recent clinical data have suggested a correlation between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and diabetes. Here, we describe the detection of SARS-CoV-2 viral antigen in pancreatic beta cells in autopsy samples from individuals with COVID-19. Single-cell RNA sequencing and immunostaining from ex vivo infections confirmed that multiple types of pancreatic islet cells were susceptible to SARS-CoV-2, eliciting a cellular stress response and the induction of chemokines. Upon SARS-CoV-2 infection, beta cells showed a lower expression of insulin and a higher expression of alpha and acinar cell markers, including glucagon and trypsin1, respectively, suggesting cellular transdifferentiation. Trajectory analysis indicated that SARS-CoV-2 induced eIF2-pathway-mediated beta cell transdifferentiation, a phenotype that could be reversed with trans-integrated stress response inhibitor (trans-ISRIB). Altogether, this study demonstrates an example of SARS-CoV-2 infection causing cell fate change, which provides further insight into the pathomechanisms of COVID-19.


Basically, the insulin-producing cells seem to have the same ACE2 receptor that makes cells in lungs susceptible to SARS-CoV-2. That makes them vulnerable to damage by the antigen.

This makes me wonder about the Pfizer and Moderna pseudo-vaccines that prompt the body to produces the SARS-CoV-2 antigen itself. Are people getting those jabs going to be developing diabetes?

Something to watch for. And perhaps someone will research that possibility.

If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in my tip jar. I could really use the money, what with ISP bills, rabbit feed, and general life expenses.Click here to donate via PayPal.

Pistol Brace Rule Commenting

The Zelman Partisans managed to submit a comment on the whack-a-mole pistol brace NPRM. Excerpts:

As no standards were given, a subjective examiner’s guesstimate of “rear surface area” could pass a brace, or put it right on the edge of alleged short-barreled rifle by itself. Will one examiner estimate the “rear surface area” of a cuff-type brace by the physical area of the rear EDGE of the cuff, while another goes by the area of the space ENCLOSED by the cuff?

Yep.

The Zelman Partisans also note that once again the ATF has violated the Administrative Procedures Act by opening docket 2021R-08, taking comments on that docket, DELETING it, and opening new docket ATF-2021-0002 without the old docket comments. The ATF does this on such a regular basis that we believe it is a deliberate attempt to discourage public comment on legally dubious proposed rules.

Gotta get that documented for posterity. And future lawsuits.

While the TZP comment is more elaborate, you may notice some similarities with my own

If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in my tip jar. I could really use the money, what with ISP bills, rabbit feed, and general life expenses.Click here to donate via PayPal.

UPDATED! “Factoring Criteria for Firearms with Attached “Stabilizing Braces””

See edit below. The ATF is playing games with the docket again Don’t be discouraged. Comment.


The ATF’s proposed rule to make virtually all AR-type braced pistols short barreled rifles has finally dropped. Again. For now. We’ll see what happens.

I say “AR-type” because the proposed rule is rather oddly specific to that platform, ignoring pretty much all others.

EDITED
You can read it and comment HERE. Comments are due by September 8, 2021.

They took comments, then killed the docket. They’ve done this repeatedly with ATF NPRMs. The point seems to be to get the first docket publicized by the gun world, then hide it from users who find nothing at the original links. This discourages commenting while sorta-semi-kinda meeting the letter of the APA law on proposed rule-making.

The docket is now Docket (ATF-2021-0002). For now.


My comment (kpq-x1fk-uj87, submitted 6/10/2021, 9:07AM EDT)

This proposed rule is a coherently expressed description of an arbitrary, capricious, and incoherent process of classifying firearms.

A purely subjective, as no standards were given, examiner’s guesstimate of “rear surface area” could pass a brace, or put it right on the edge of alleged short-barreled rifle by itself.

“Length of pull” presupposes that all braced pistols are SBRs until proven otherwise. The restriction on brace length would make it a one-size-fits some piece of junk. Brace properly fitted for me would be unworkable for a smaller person.

Also, it appears that the ATF is unaware of braced pistols that are not AR-type. The attachment evaluation assumes an AR-type buffer tube. The weight and overall length exclude the entire class of drop-in pistols braces, such as for Glocks. The rule is silent on those. Is the braced Glock automatically an SBR because it fail the 4999 Section tests? Or would the chassis resembling a carbine NEVER be a rifle?

And why in the world would flip-up iron sights (which one might well want for storage and transport) make a pistol into a rifle?

This mess could have been avoided by adopting a sane definition of stabilizing brace: “A device designed to aid a user in holding a large pistol with one hand, which extends no further than the user’s forearm when gripping the firearm normally, and which conforms to the user’s forearm.”

As usual, the ATF is an incoherent solution in search of a nonexistent problem.

If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in my tip jar. I could really use the money, what with ISP bills, rabbit feed, and general life expenses.Click here to donate via PayPal.

I know US mil rank nomenclature can be a bit odd…

…but WTF?

US Lieutenant Commander exposed for pushing divisive critical race theory

“Lieutenant Commander”

Got it. Wait…

“Lieutenant Colonel Andrew Rhodes”
“Lieutenant Rhodes”
“Commander Rhodes”

Basically, Post Millenial’s Nick Monroe appears to have lifted all the meat of the story from Human Events, but has no clue as to how rank and position titles work. Posobiec is considerably clearer on the subject: Lieutenant Colonel Rhodes seems to be a battalion commander. And he sounds like quite the piece of… work.

If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in my tip jar. I could really use the money, what with ISP bills, rabbit feed, and general life expenses.Click here to donate via PayPal.

Firearm Definition Comment News

Ah! My site is back up. I have no idea what happened, unless it was related to that big cloud outage. Anyway, here’s what I wanted to post…


Sunnavagun. My original comment on the firearm/ghost gun Notice of Proposed Rule-Making finally posted.

I submitted that one on May 21. It was posted June; just 17 effing days, and 14 days after the most recent comment I submitted.

Ah, well; I think it took them more than a month to post my bumpstock NPRM comment. That screwed up commenting on that rule so badly that it not only got specific mention by the Attorney General (who lied through his teeth) in the final rule, but made it into a federal lawsuit.

If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in my tip jar. I could really use the money, what with ISP bills, rabbit feed, and general life expenses.Click here to donate via PayPal.

New Post On Pistol Braces and the ATF at TZP

The new Notice of Proposed Rule-Making on pistol braces (braced pistol vs. short-barreled rifle) is coming. The Zelman Partisans have an analysis of the NPRM.

ATF’S STABILIZING BRACE RULE ON THE WAY
[…]
As usual, the ATF is an incoherent solution in search of a nonexistent problem.

If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in my tip jar. I could really use the money, what with ISP bills, rabbit feed, and general life expenses.Click here to donate via PayPal.