Spaceport Camden Is A Corrupt Graft Scam

If you hadn’t figured that out already, I present definitive proof.

DoD officials wanted to know if an analysis had been done for buildings at Kings Bay that may house large ordnance. The base maintains and stores nuclear ballistic missiles that are carried aboard Ohio-class submarines deployed from Kings Bay.

The probability of a rocket malfunction turning toward Kings Bay, combined with a failure of the autonomous termination system, has not been considered, consultants said.

The possibility of a rocket going off-course towards a nearby (@ 5 miles) military base with nuclear weapons

“has not been considered”!!!

They’ve been trying this for years. They’ve spent over $9 million.

And I’m to believe they never “considered” the question that I and others have been asking for at least six years?

The Navy forced us to close our dinky little general aviation airport (contributing to a suicide), but they never considered potential impacts on a nuclear base?

If this was for real, if it was anything but a scam to steal taxpayer money, that would have been the very first thing they would have checked. They would have figured that out before spending another penny, much less $9,278,164 (and counting).

It’s well past time for county commissioners and Howard to go to prison.

 

Consider that.

If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in my tip jar. I could really use the money, what with ISP bills, rabbit feed, and general life expenses.Click here to donate via PayPal.

Published by

Bear

2A advocate, writer, firearms policy & law analyst, general observer of pre-apocalyptic American life.

2 thoughts on “Spaceport Camden Is A Corrupt Graft Scam”

  1. Amazing piece! I hope it’s o. k. that I shared it on “Should Camden Co. Reject Spaceport?” on Facebook. My opinion is in the name. 😉

Leave a Reply to Alex Wise Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.