I’m trying to understand how this state supreme court ruling complies with the same damned baker’s SCOTUS ruling.
Colorado Baker Who Refused to Make ‘Gender Transition’ Cake Loses Appeal
“We conclude that creating a pink cake with blue frosting is not inherently expressive and any message or symbolism it provides to an observer would not be attributed to the baker,” the ruling said.
If it isn’t “expressive speech” by the baker, then why was it so damned important to make the baker do it?
Gab Pay link (More Tip Jar Options) |