Draft of Proposed Rule-Making “Definition of “Frame or Receiver” and Identification of Firearms” Dropped

I’ll post an analysis of the whole thing when I’m done. Right now I’ve made it to page 32 of 107. I’m copying sections and drafting my comments for submission when commenting opens for real.

To give you an idea of how bad this is, let me show you a couple of excerpts of my comments.

Is there anyone in the ATF with two functional brain cells?

I figured I’d edit that out of the formal comment, but then I got to the next part, and this emerged from my busy fingers.

Congratulations. You propose defining paperweights as firearms. I suspect the use of recreational pharmaceuticals.

So both of those will in the formal submission.

If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in my tip jar. I could really use the money, what with ISP bills, rabbit feed, and general life expenses.Click here to donate via PayPal.

Published by

Bear

2A advocate, writer, firearms policy & law analyst, general observer of pre-apocalyptic American life.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *