Tell me more about how effective the ChinCOVID pseudovax is.

‘Cuz the math doesn’t seem to add up, Hotez.


Dr. Hotez: ‘150,000 Unvaccinated Americans Needlessly Lost Their Lives Because They Were Defiant’
Center for Vaccine Development director Dr. Peter Hotez said Monday on MSNBC’s “Andrea Mitchell Reports” that since COVID-19 vaccines have been available, “150,000 unvaccinated Americans needlessly lost their lives because they were defiant.”


Lessee, the first pseudo-vax became available in December 2020. At that time some 370,000 deaths were attributed to COVID.

Since the pseudo-vax has been available, another 429,000+/- have died. But if only 150,000 were us unwashed, ignorant anti-pseudo-vaxxers, then that implies the other 279,000 dead were enlightened vaxxed.

So:

Un”vaxxed: 150K/429K = 34.9%
“Vaxxed: 279K/429K = 65%

Given those numbers, I think I’ll just go on being “defiant.”

 

If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in my tip jar. I could really use the money, what with ISP bills, site hosting and SSL certificate, new 2021 model hip, and general life expenses.Click here to donate via PayPal.

Doesn’t Look Good For CDC Pseudo-Vax Numbers

You may recall that some six months ago, barely over half of NIAID, FDA, and CDC employees would get the ChinCOVID pseudo-vax jabs (even though they’re just fine with us getting stuck). Months later, a a feddie employee pseudo-vax mandate, and the chance to set a “fine” example”…


As Biden Mandates Vaccines, CDC Director Walensky Stumbles When Asked How Many CDC Employees Are Vaccinated
“What percent of CDC employees are vaccinated?” Rep. Cassidy asked.

“We’re actively encouraging vaccination on all of our employees and doing a lot of education and outreach in order to get our agency fully vaccinated,’ she said, completely dodging the question.

“And the — but the percent?” he asked.

“I don’t have that for you today,” she admitted.


How odd. What with the mandate, and the hearing subject, you’d think she’d have the number sitting right there.

 

If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in my tip jar. I could really use the money, what with new cell phone, ISP bills, SSL certificate, and general life expenses.Click here to donate via PayPal.

OSHA’s Insane Pseudo-Vax Mandate Is Official

The rule/emergency temporary standard is HERE. I recommend commenting on it. My own comment, kvm-hl07-1qtk, reads as follows:


You are mandating that employees choose between employment and “vaccination.” I put “vaccination” in parentheses because the CDC currently has TWO differing definitions of “vaccine.”

The long standing definition is a substance that directly confers immunity.

For COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 ALONE, the goverment has adopted a second definition of a substance that MAY confer some protection against the worst symptoms, but prevents neither infection, transmission, nor illness.

The COVID-19 pseudo-vaccines seems pointless.

Additionally, the currently available COVID-19 “vaccines” has been associated with the highest rate of adverse effects (including DEATH) of any vaccine in recorded history.

The COVID-19 pseudo-vaccines seem dangerous.

Currently, and for the foreseeable future, no APPROVED adult form COVID-19 “vaccine” is available. The approved vaccine, Pfizer’s Comirnaty, has not shipped. Because of the legal differences between EUA and approved vaccines, a person who accepts an EUA jab instead waiting for the unavailable Comirnaty has little effective recourse is seeking compensation from the manufacturer, in the event of an adverse effect.

This places the employer at full liability for any adverse effects experienced in a association with an inoculation with an EUA medication WHICH IS ONLY AUTHORIZED ON A VOLUNTARY BASIS, with complete informed consent.

Your emergency temporary standard is insane, and will go far to completing the economic collapse of the nation.


Please note that my objections are not based on wild conspiracy sites, or “alternate” medicine claims. They ARE based on data provided by Pfizer, FDA, The CDC, and OSHA themselves.

Commenting on a rule already in effect may seem pointless, but it’s to put them on notice that we are know what they’ve done and continue to watch.

If I can comment in my current pained condition, so can you.

 

If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in my tip jar. I could really use the money, what with new cell phone, ISP bills, SSL certificate, and general life expenses.Click here to donate via PayPal.

“But we’re never going to learn about how safe this vaccine is unless you start giving it.”

That’s just the way it goes.

Funny, that’s what I thought Stage 1, 2, and 3 trials were for.

If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in my tip jar. I could really use the money, what with new cell phone, ISP bills, SSL certificate, and general life expenses.Click here to donate via PayPal.

Presented without comment,

…other than “Draw your own conclusions.”

Questions you need to answer before approving the COVID vaccines for any age group

If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in my tip jar. I could really use the money, what with new cell phone, ISP bills, SSL certificate, and general life expenses.Click here to donate via PayPal.

COVID Vax Causing AIDS?

I’m starting to see this UK report pop up.


A comparison of official Government reports suggest the Fully Vaccinated are developing Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
Latest UK PHE Vaccine Surveillance Report figures on Covid cases show that doubly vaccinated 40-70 year olds have lost 40% of their immune system capability compared to unvaccinated people. Their immune systems are deteriorating at around 5% per week (between 2.7% and 8.7%). If this continues then 30-50 year olds will have 100% immune system degradation, zero viral defence by Christmas and all doubly vaccinated people over 30 will have lost their immune systems by March next year.


Nope. That data does not show people getting Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome. The Expose has confused “vaccine efficacy” with immunosuppression. The data presented only shows that the pseudo-vax becomes less effective against SARS-CoV-2 over time. It does not show why that seems to be the case.

The effectivess can drop for other reasons, like SARS-CoV-2 variants not as well recognized by pseudo-vax-prompted antibodies.

The data we need to be able to say that the pseudo-vaxxes cause AIDS is comparisons of lymphocytes in the blood:

  • Before the jab
  • After the first jab
  • After the second jab
  • And periodically after that, to see if there is a continuing trend.

To date, I am aware of one case of this being done, by doctor who was concerned about a specific patient. He did see a significant drop in lymphocytes, which he specifically compared to AIDS. He called for more doctors to check this.

There is also a report that “Pfizer data shows significant lymphocyte depletion in the first week after vaccination.” I have not seen that data.

Perhaps the pseudo-vaxxes are causing AIDS, but The Expose story does not support their own claim.

If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in my tip jar. I could really use the money, what with new cell phone, ISP bills, SSL certificate, and general life expenses.Click here to donate via PayPal.

Another Pseudo-Vax Passport Scheme

And it’s… troubling.This comes from a video that apparently was part of a presentation at the World Economic Forum. It’s another smartphone QR code thing, but it isn’t based on being entered into a database when you are jabbed.


Users will have their blood screened at an approved CovidPass laboratory…

Before being issued with a secure QP health visa via their phone.

CovidPass’s creators say that using blood test data, it’s 100% reliable.


That link is at The Conservative Treehouse, and it gets into conspiracy theory territory. But their questions are legit.

What kind of blood test for the jab (apparently any of the multiples) can be 100% reliable?

For a few weeks post-jab with the mRNA/DNA-coding for protein spikes type jabs, a blood test could show spike proteins circulating (which I suspect is part of the recent surge in positive PCR tests). But that’s only for a few weeks.

For a few months, they could do antibody testing. But there are two issues there. For one, it wouldn’t differentiate between jab-induced antibodies and infection-induced antibodies. For another, antibodies don’t permanently circulate; AB production drops off and stops after the pathogen is eliminated.

In either event, spike protein or antibody, neither test is 100%. Read the news and you’ll see plenty of reports about false positives and negatives.

So what would this blood test look for that conclusively indicates that one has received one of any of the many pseudo-vaccines, 100% of the time?

With our would-be lords and masters saying stuff like this, it’s no wonder the conspiracy-prone keep worrying about mystery markers in the pseudo-vaxxes. (And if anyone is interested, I’d be happy to explain why the RFID chip theory really isn’t physically — physics — possible with our technology.)

(Hat tip to Vin Suprynowicz for the link.)

If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in my tip jar. I could really use the money, what with new cell phone, ISP bills, SSL certificate, and general life expenses.Click here to donate via PayPal.

Your Daily Dose Of COVID-19 WTF

OK, this is disturbing. Let me start with a recap of the background.

The COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 PCR test, used to screen for ChinCOVID, was originally created without access to the actual virus. In very short form, they looked at a Chinese public database of what the Chinese said was a partial nucleotide sequence of SARS-CoV-2. Two sequences were selected from that. Then they assumed that a third sequence found in the original SARS virus would also be in SARS-CoV-2. They then prepared a series of reagents to detect those sequences.

That is what the CDC published.

While it turns out there serious problems with the creation of the test, in theory I would consider this an acceptable interim emergency test for what they thought at the time was a disease with a fatality rate of 10% or more. But as soon as physically possible, they should obtain an actual sample of the virus, an isolate, sequence it, and create a new test for sequences now determined to be in the actual virus (preferably sequences unique to SARS-CoV-2).

Now for the WTF.

This morning, I realized that the CDC has been revising their CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel. As of the seventh revision on July 21, 2021, this year, they still say


Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA…


Twenty months into the so-called pandemic, and they were still saying they didn’t have a sample of the actual SARS-CoV-2 virus to sequence. I repeat, WTF?

Why not?

Never mind the questions this raises about whether the PCR test really detects SARS-CoV-2 (or something else?), or if there is a SARS-CoV-2 to detect, think about the pseudo-vaccines. They were all developed prior to 7/21/2021, naturally.

They were developed on the assumption/belief/knowledge that SARS-CoV-2 has a nucleotide sequence that would code for a specific spike protein. They genegineered mRNA or DNA (depends on the pseudo-vax) to cause production of that specific spike protein.

But if as late as 7/21/2021 no one had the actual virus, how can they be sure SARS-CoV-2 uses that spike protein?

Someone please tell me, with links to supporting documentation, that someone has isolated SARS-CoV-2, and has confirmed the sequences (and thus the spike protein).

If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in my tip jar. I could really use the money, what with new cell phone, ISP bills, SSL certificate, and general life expenses.Click here to donate via PayPal.

[Update] ChinCOVID Complilation

Vin Suprynowicz has an excellent compilation of ChinCOVID reports. It’s pretty much a one-stop shop for all your COVID data needs.

Two items in particular caught my eye. One, I knew about, but Vin’s link had more details. While VAERS reports around 16,000 pseudo-vax related deaths, someone at CMS (Medicare/Medicaid) leaked another dataset. CMS shows over 48,000 deaths within 14 days of getting the jab. And reportedly 25% of the people who received Remdesivir therapy died.

The other bit was new to me. A person went to his long-time doctor because his employer mandated the pseudo-vax. The doctor already had long baseline blood work on the patient, so he decided to do more tests after the man received each jab, with special attention to immune function. The doctor did a video with the details of what he found, but YouTube already pulled it. Hopefully it’ll go up on another outlet like Rumble, because I want to confirm what the write-up said.

Added: The video is now on Rumble. (Thanks, Vin.)

Reportedly, post-vax, the man demonstrated a profund drop in leukocyes, meaning he’s now immunocompromised. This might explain why so many pseudo-vaxxed people are getting sick.

If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in my tip jar. I could really use the money, what with new cell phone, ISP bills, SSL certificate, and general life expenses.Click here to donate via PayPal.

ChinCOVID Pseudo-Vax and Myocarditis; My Bad

A few days ago, I wrote about the scary fact that there is a 1 in a thousand chance of myocarditis from the Pfizer pseudo-vax jab. I stand corrected. That stat came from an FDA panel hearing, and I thought they were specifically referring to the Pfizer crap.

This morning, I found the paper that I believe is the source of the 1:1,000 statistic. It’s a Canadian study, and it isn’t just the Pfizer jab. The 1:1,000 is an average of both Pfizer and Moderna. Worse yet, the incidence in Moderna recipients victims was three times higher than in Pfizer jabees.

So when I said we may be needing 10,000 spare hearts for transplants in the next few years? Forget that.

As of 9/21/2021, Reuters reports that 212,255,202 Americans have received at least one dose of one of the vaccines. Pfizer and Moderna make up the bulk of those. At the 1:1,000 ratio, we may actually need 212,255 spare hearts.

Yes, 212,255.

So… Sorry. My misunderstanding caused me to underestimate the potential need for transplant material by a freaking order of magnitude. Times two.

Looking at ChinCOVID fatality rates for my age group (and bearing in mind that unlike the majority od deaths I’m not obese, diabetic, hypertensive, etc.), and that post-jab myocarditis cases are 79% male…

I’m at a far greater risk of death from the jab than I am from the disease that I haven’t gotten during 21 months of plandemic.

And that’s just myocarditis, never mind all the other adverse effects.

If you attempt to “vaccinate” me with that shit, I will offer you a gun violence vaccination. Two doses to the chest, and a booster shot to the head.

If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in my tip jar. I could really use the money, what with new cell phone, ISP bills, SSL certificate, and general life expenses.Click here to donate via PayPal.